LotR TCG DB → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC
The Last Homely House | Middle-Earth | Lothlórien | Austrian | Namarie (POLL)

Welcome, guests!

Join our growing LotR community today and you'll get:

  • Access to special members only-forums.
  • A great way to connect and hook up with other players.
  • Removal of advertisements in the forums and card database.
  • The ability to list cards you want to trade or sell.
  • ...And much more!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8  All   Go Down
« previous next »
Print

Author Topic: Namarie (POLL)  (Read 5032 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MR. Lurtzy
King
*****
Offline Offline

Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2753


Way Past Cool

Gold: +218
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2009, 01:42:12 PM »
0
It should be R-listed, not banned.
Logged
MR. Lurtzy's Tradelist.


Kralik
The Grey Pilgrim
Administrator
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Kralik
Formats: Fellowship, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 1990


Gold: +267

WWW
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2009, 02:11:41 PM »
0
Maybe the poll should be changed to the options:

-X-list
-R-list
-Neither

If you only had one copy it'd still be quite powerful, but you'd have to draw it and it can't be replaced with Gil-Galad as easily.
Logged
Why not give GCCG a whirl?
Gil-Estel
King
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Heije
Formats: Movie for sure, never walk the standard path
Posts: 2290


Abuser of the Force

Gold: +171
« Reply #17 on: May 14, 2009, 02:12:34 PM »
0
Ban Gil-Galad please.....
Logged
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
Kralik
The Grey Pilgrim
Administrator
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Kralik
Formats: Fellowship, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 1990


Gold: +267

WWW
« Reply #18 on: May 14, 2009, 02:13:17 PM »
0
Quote from: Gil-Estel on May 14, 2009, 02:12:34 PM
Ban Gil-Galad please.....

*snifffffff* Cry
Logged
Why not give GCCG a whirl?
Gil-Estel
King
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Heije
Formats: Movie for sure, never walk the standard path
Posts: 2290


Abuser of the Force

Gold: +171
« Reply #19 on: May 14, 2009, 02:15:39 PM »
0
Sorry Kralik Wink didn't mean to dissapoint you Sad
Logged
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
MR. Lurtzy
King
*****
Offline Offline

Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2753


Way Past Cool

Gold: +218
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2009, 02:39:07 PM »
0
What about an errata?
Logged
MR. Lurtzy's Tradelist.
Foresight
Marksman
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 583


Hunting your kind down...

Gold: +5

WWW
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2009, 02:56:22 PM »
0
Quote from: MR. Lurtzy on May 14, 2009, 02:39:07 PM
What about an errata?

Make it unique. Cheesy
Logged
Like a force of nature, the Uruks are Unstoppable. Uruk-hai
Kralik
The Grey Pilgrim
Administrator
Knight
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: Kralik
Formats: Fellowship, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 1990


Gold: +267

WWW
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2009, 03:06:01 PM »
0
Quote from: Foresight on May 14, 2009, 02:56:22 PM
Quote from: MR. Lurtzy on May 14, 2009, 02:39:07 PM
What about an errata?

Make it unique. Cheesy

R-list is better IMO.
Logged
Why not give GCCG a whirl?
Elrohir
Marksman
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 592


If you want him, come and claim him!

Gold: +51

WWW
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2009, 03:19:04 PM »
0
It is a strange fate that we should suffer so much fear and doubt over so a small card.

Changeing Austria Format is the wrong way! I am absolutely against changing this Format. As it depends on Standard Format, we should change the standard Ruling for Namarie. According to this, Austria Format gets it new rules, and it is still clear.

Elven Supplies need the tokens of Namarie!

So, my suggestions for Namarie are (not detailed, but I am sure you understand what I mean):
1) Add a Elven token here for each  Elven hunter you can spot.
OR
2) Discard this or remove two Elven tokens here and spot an Elven hunter, to discard a condition.

To sum up: Do not change Austria Format X-List! It has to be the same as Standard!! So, if People decide to edit anything, then it should be done for Standard!

Quote from: Gil-Estel on May 14, 2009, 02:12:34 PM
Ban Gil-Galad please.....
I like the R+ one much more than the new one.

Elrohir

PS: Shadow Conditions are not meant to stay in play if they are facing  Gandalf or Elven culture!

Quote from: Malachi on May 14, 2009, 10:05:14 AM
Had a game recenly where my opponent had 2 Namarie out with 5 Hunter companions. Each regroup he used Gil-Galad to play from discard 2-3 Elven Marksmanship and 1-2 Take up the Bow, then replay Namarie itself. So, even without the Faithful Stone almost none of my minions ever get to skirmish, not to mention my conditions.
This makes Sting of Shelob, Unseen Foe... pretty playable!
« Last Edit: May 14, 2009, 03:28:18 PM by Elrohir » Logged
You gave away your life's grace. I cannot protect you anymore.
Fingolfinfinwe
Bowman
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 443


Gold: +25
« Reply #24 on: May 14, 2009, 03:19:34 PM »
0
In a perfect world both Namarie and Gil-Galad would get an errata, but since errata is definitely something to avoid for simplicity sake restriction/banning is more in line.  I think Namarie has to at least be restricted.
Logged
MR. Lurtzy
King
*****
Offline Offline

Formats: Fellowship; Towers Standard
Posts: 2753


Way Past Cool

Gold: +218
« Reply #25 on: May 14, 2009, 03:48:59 PM »
0
I fully agree with Elrohir.
Logged
MR. Lurtzy's Tradelist.
Fingolfinfinwe
Bowman
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 443


Gold: +25
« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2009, 06:10:12 PM »
0
I agree that it would be best if Namarie were restricted in Standard (which would affect Austrian).
Logged
SomeRandomDude
Maia
********
Offline Offline

Formats: Standard, Expanded, Movie
Posts: 7012


Most Likely To Usurp Kralik and Dáin

Gold: +194

WWW
« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2009, 10:17:04 PM »
0
We can't change standard. We don't have a PC and big D ain't doing anything anytime soon.

I think the optimal idea is banning Gil-Galad because he's the broken part of the combo, not Namarie, but that idea will never fly so I guess Namarie's gotta go.
Logged
NB- 4 year veteran of CC/TLHH

"It was like:
Kralik: "What hath God wrought"
NB: "I dunno, but I'm in ur house eating ur food.""
-Elessar's Socks

Trade List- ft. Aragorn, Defender of Rohan
King89
Horseman
****
Offline Offline

GCCG: King89
Formats: Standard, Movie, Austrian
Posts: 323


your master.

Gold: +81

WWW
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2009, 01:09:04 AM »
0
i guess we will play with namarie x-listed in austria format, independent how this poll will finish. although it looks really good. Thumbs Up
Logged
german.
---
- German Lotr Tcg Board -
- My Trade&Sell List -
MD85
Ranger
*****
Offline Offline

GCCG: muaddib85
Formats: Movie, Standard.
Posts: 931


Gold: +82
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2009, 01:11:34 AM »
0
IMO hunter elves ares strong enough without namarie, so for those people who must use gil-galad, there are still plenty of other token cards.

Namarie is way too overpowered. Should definately be banned.  Elves also have some other nice condition removal, so the only thing that is to be lost with Namarie X-listed is the broken combo of destroying any condition based shadow decks.

I have never played Austrian format but it looks interesting, from my experience playing standard format, games are alot more fun (and more even) without namarie involved.
Logged
http://lotrtcgdb.com/forums/index.php/topic,4272.msg49964.html#msg49964 <- Collection For Sale!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8  All   Go Up
Print
« previous next »
Jump to: