|
|
Sam, Great Elf Warrior
|
 |
« Reply #76 on: March 18, 2010, 08:14:14 PM » |
 0
|
Okay, I can understand all those other cards, but how exactly does Nasty help? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
MD85
Ranger
 Offline
GCCG: muaddib85
Formats: Movie, Standard.
Posts: 931
Gold: +82
|
|
« Reply #78 on: March 18, 2010, 10:11:12 PM » |
0
|
Not the card nasty.... 'nasty stuff' as in 'this will hurt'.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smeagollum
Guest
|
|
« Reply #79 on: March 21, 2010, 06:05:23 AM » |
0
|
I am dreaming of a full equiped Dessert Lord With seasoned leaders mean to exert to be enduring.. Oh what will those arrows hurt And with a fierce making mumakYou will listen when hear your companion mourn |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kralik
The Grey Pilgrim
Administrator
Knight
Offline
GCCG: Kralik
Formats: Fellowship, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 1990
Gold: +267
|
|
« Reply #80 on: March 21, 2010, 09:02:03 AM » |
0
|
And you will cry when your opponent plays Company of Archers... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smeagollum
Guest
|
|
« Reply #81 on: March 21, 2010, 09:03:59 AM » |
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Witchkingx5
Knight
Offline
Formats: Movie, Standard
Posts: 1173
I will crush all of you...
Gold: +55
|
|
« Reply #82 on: March 21, 2010, 09:58:05 AM » |
0
|
Why that? I mean, the discarding happens before the exerting, and one condition less doesn't hurt so much at all...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ket_the_jet
Better than nothing!
Lord
Offline
GCCG: wtk
Formats: FotR, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 3453
Gold: +212
|
 |
« Reply #83 on: March 21, 2010, 10:45:43 AM » |
0
|
Not necessarily. Let them exert until exhausted and then discard for the kill.
It is even better with maneuver exhaustion.
-wtk
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Witchkingx5
Knight
Offline
Formats: Movie, Standard
Posts: 1173
I will crush all of you...
Gold: +55
|
|
« Reply #84 on: March 21, 2010, 12:49:16 PM » |
0
|
OOps, seems as I read the card wrong.. Anyway, I also like Company of Archers most as an Elven condition discarding event, but the best one still is Galadriel, recycling garbage and discarding everything!(Btw, did I mention how I love giving other names to cards?  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smeagollum
Guest
|
|
« Reply #85 on: March 21, 2010, 03:40:46 PM » |
0
|
Not necessarily. Let them exert until exhausted and then discard for the kill.
It is even better with maneuver exhaustion.
-wtk
So if you play against elven and you weren't able to see opponent's hand then you won't exhaust  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Faelach
Tracker
Offline
Posts: 146
Gold: +3
|
|
« Reply #86 on: April 17, 2010, 10:08:19 AM » |
0
|
Why was Horn of Boromir banned? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do not take dragons lightly. They are heavier than you think.
|
|
|
ket_the_jet
Better than nothing!
Lord
Offline
GCCG: wtk
Formats: FotR, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 3453
Gold: +212
|
|
« Reply #87 on: April 17, 2010, 11:23:02 AM » |
0
|
Horn of Boromir was seen as a way of circumventing the Rule of 9 and a way to control the twilight pool...not adding enough pool for companions when you have a ton of allies to "take one for the team" was too frustrating for Shadow players and made for boring games. -wtk
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Faelach
Tracker
Offline
Posts: 146
Gold: +3
|
|
« Reply #88 on: April 17, 2010, 12:39:44 PM » |
0
|
That makes complete sense. The Horn would "call" up what were essentially companions even if you already had 9 companions in play.
That one never clicked before. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do not take dragons lightly. They are heavier than you think.
|
|
|
Kralik
The Grey Pilgrim
Administrator
Knight
Offline
GCCG: Kralik
Formats: Fellowship, Towers, TS, Movie
Posts: 1990
Gold: +267
|
|
« Reply #89 on: April 18, 2010, 09:01:17 AM » |
0
|
But that is what the Horn of Boromir was MEANT to do! It's a good strategy, but requires LOTS of card slots to be viable and isn't really splashable. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
